Skip navigation


  • DSpace logo
  • Home
  • Collections
  • Researcher Profile
  • Explore by
    • Researcher Profile
  • VGU library
  • Help
  • User Guide
  • Sign on to:
    • My DSpace
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Account details

VGU RESEARCH REPOSITORY


Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://epub.vgu.edu.vn/handle/dlibvgu/541
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLe Hoang Namen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-12T17:03:34Z-
dc.date.available2020-03-12T17:03:34Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.urihttp://epub.vgu.edu.vn/handle/dlibvgu/541-
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this thesis was to apply and compare different acquisition and reconstruction methods to three breast DCE-MRI data and a phantom data. Specifically, the study revisited the generalized series (GS) method as well as its variation, called generalized series with temporal constraint (GenSeT) and applied them to the experimental data. The results were then compared to those of the discrete Fourier transform (DEC), the time-resolved imaging with stochastic trajectories (TWIST) and the generalized series with TWIST sequence (twistGS) methods, The GS model, developed by Liang and Lauterbur. uses a high resolution as reference for reconstruction. This method is based on the observation that in many imaging applications, the high-resolution image morphology does not change over time. Specifically. the reference image is incorporated in to the GS basis functions, the subsequent dynamic images can be reconstructed with fewer spatial encodings, which allows a faster and more efficient acquisition process. In this study, the experimental data were sparsely sampled along a predefined trajectory. The undersampled data were reconstructed using the above reconstruction schemes. Experimental results showed that the GS and GenSeT reconstructions provided better spatial resolution and more accurate dynamic information than the DFT method. However, the those methods showed consistently inferior performance compared to the TWIST and twistGS schemes. The results implied that the GS-based methods need to be improved mathematically in order to be applied effectively in DCE-MRI. Additionally, choices of sampling trajectories affected reconstruction results considerably. Finally, because the breast data, which were used as the groud truths, were acquired using the TWIST sequence, experimental results might have been biased in favor of the TW1ST-based methods.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherVietnamese-German Universityen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/*
dc.subjectDynamic contrasten_US
dc.subjectMagnetic resonance imagingen_US
dc.subjectSparse samplingen_US
dc.subjectReconstructionen_US
dc.titleDynamic contrast-ehanced magnetic resonance imaging - sparse sampling & reconstructionen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
item.grantfulltextrestricted-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1other-
Appears in Collections:Electrical Engineering and Information Technology (EEIT)
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat Existing users please Login
Dynamic contrast-ehanced magnetic resonance imaging - sparse sampling & reconstruction.pdf285.15 MBAdobe PDF
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

36
checked on Aug 23, 2025

Download(s)

8
checked on Aug 23, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

© Copyright 2020 by Vietnamese - German University Library.
Add: Ring road 4, Quarter 4, Thoi Hoa Ward, Ben Cat City, Binh Duong Province
Tel.:(0274) 222 0990. Ext.: 70206